BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Science in Seattle - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Science in Seattle
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://scienceinseattle.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Science in Seattle
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Vancouver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20200308T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20201101T090000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20210314T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20211107T090000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20220313T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20221106T090000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T133000
DTSTAMP:20260719T232537
CREATED:20210304T213639Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210304T213639Z
UID:11804-1616587200-1616592600@scienceinseattle.com
SUMMARY:What Really Happens in an NIH Study Review
DESCRIPTION:The session will answer the question: How is your NIH submitted grant reviewed and scored? Dr. Martin and Dr. Amory will review how an NIH Study Section works and evaluates your grant\, with specific emphasis on the importance of stating a clear hypothesis and the five main sections of the proposal. A better understanding of how grants are evaluated can inform your grant writing process and help clearly communicate your ideas to reviewers\, maximizing your changes of receiving funding. \nPRE-WORK\nBefore the CDS live event on March 24th\, please view this 15min video “NIH Peer Review Revealed” at https://www.csr.nih.gov/video/2010/CSRVideoRevealed.mov \nLEARNING OBJECTIVES\nAt the end of the session\, participants will be able to: \n\nList the five scored components of the grant application\nDescribe the central importance of clearly stated and testable hypothesis to the success of the application\nList the four different ways a grant reviewer will categorize the application\n\nSCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES\n\n12:00-12:05pm – Welcome\, Overview\, Introductions\n12:05-1:25pm – Presentation and Q&A\n1:25-1:30pm – Thank You and Feedback Survey
URL:https://scienceinseattle.com/event/what-really-happens-in-an-nih-study-review/
LOCATION:Online
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T133000
DTSTAMP:20260719T232537
CREATED:20210304T213639Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210304T213639Z
UID:25683-1616587200-1616592600@scienceinseattle.com
SUMMARY:What Really Happens in an NIH Study Review
DESCRIPTION:The session will answer the question: How is your NIH submitted grant reviewed and scored? Dr. Martin and Dr. Amory will review how an NIH Study Section works and evaluates your grant\, with specific emphasis on the importance of stating a clear hypothesis and the five main sections of the proposal. A better understanding of how grants are evaluated can inform your grant writing process and help clearly communicate your ideas to reviewers\, maximizing your changes of receiving funding. \nPRE-WORK\nBefore the CDS live event on March 24th\, please view this 15min video “NIH Peer Review Revealed” at https://www.csr.nih.gov/video/2010/CSRVideoRevealed.mov \nLEARNING OBJECTIVES\nAt the end of the session\, participants will be able to: \n\nList the five scored components of the grant application\nDescribe the central importance of clearly stated and testable hypothesis to the success of the application\nList the four different ways a grant reviewer will categorize the application\n\nSCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES\n\n12:00-12:05pm – Welcome\, Overview\, Introductions\n12:05-1:25pm – Presentation and Q&A\n1:25-1:30pm – Thank You and Feedback Survey
URL:https://scienceinseattle.com/event/what-really-happens-in-an-nih-study-review-2/
LOCATION:Online
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Vancouver:20210324T133000
DTSTAMP:20260719T232537
CREATED:20210304T213639Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210304T213639Z
UID:26648-1616587200-1616592600@scienceinseattle.com
SUMMARY:What Really Happens in an NIH Study Review
DESCRIPTION:The session will answer the question: How is your NIH submitted grant reviewed and scored? Dr. Martin and Dr. Amory will review how an NIH Study Section works and evaluates your grant\, with specific emphasis on the importance of stating a clear hypothesis and the five main sections of the proposal. A better understanding of how grants are evaluated can inform your grant writing process and help clearly communicate your ideas to reviewers\, maximizing your changes of receiving funding. \nPRE-WORK\nBefore the CDS live event on March 24th\, please view this 15min video “NIH Peer Review Revealed” at https://www.csr.nih.gov/video/2010/CSRVideoRevealed.mov \nLEARNING OBJECTIVES\nAt the end of the session\, participants will be able to: \n\nList the five scored components of the grant application\nDescribe the central importance of clearly stated and testable hypothesis to the success of the application\nList the four different ways a grant reviewer will categorize the application\n\nSCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES\n\n12:00-12:05pm – Welcome\, Overview\, Introductions\n12:05-1:25pm – Presentation and Q&A\n1:25-1:30pm – Thank You and Feedback Survey
URL:https://scienceinseattle.com/event/what-really-happens-in-an-nih-study-review-3/
LOCATION:Online
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR